Home›Compare›Eden vs InsideTracker

Eden vs InsideTracker: Which Is Better?

Head-to-head comparison of Eden and InsideTracker based on our independent scoring across trust, value, experience, product range, and reputation — plus real pricing for the treatments they both offer.

Our Verdict

Eden scores higher overall in our independent evaluation (63.8/100 vs 58.4/100), leading on value, product range, reputation. InsideTracker comes out ahead on trust & safety, experience. InsideTracker has the lower entry price (from $12/mo vs $124/mo), so the better value depends on which treatment you need.

Eden

Fair

DTC telehealth platform specializing in compounded GLP-1 weight-loss medications with flat-rate dose-independent pricing and the world's first compounded GLP-1 gummy.

Visit Eden

InsideTracker

Fair

Biomarker-analytics platform selling Quest-drawn blood panels plus an annual membership that turns results into nutrition, supplement and lifestyle recommendations; no prescribing.

Visit InsideTracker

Score Breakdown

Dimension	Eden	InsideTracker
Overall Score	63.8/100 ✓	58.4/100
Trust & Safety30%	65/100	66/100 ✓
Value25%	70/100 ✓	50/100
Experience20%	60/100	62/100 ✓
Product Range15%	55/100 ✓	50/100
Reputation10%	65/100 ✓	62/100

At a Glance

Founded	2020	2009
Headquarters	Denver, CO	Cambridge, MA
Publicly traded	No	No
Treatment categories	7	2
Treatments listed	5	2
Starting price	$124/mo	$12/mo

Pricing Where They Compete

Prices shown are based on our most recent research and may not reflect current pricing. Telehealth providers update their pricing frequently. Always verify pricing directly with the provider before purchasing.

Category	Eden	InsideTracker
Longevity & Peptides	$215 NAD+ Anti-Aging Injections	$28–$113 Ultimate Blood Panel (member price, $340/test)

Eden

+Flat-rate dose-independent GLP-1 pricing — cost doesn't increase with dose escalation

+World's first compounded GLP-1 Rx gummy (needle-free alternative)

+Fast approval and overnight shipping; streamlined signup-to-medication process

−Advertised monthly rates assume three- or six-month plans on most products while the site also advertises no long-term contracts

−The Eden-branded vial images the FDA objected to were still on the site on 2026-09-19, three months after a fifteen-working-day response deadline; the FDA-licensed wording has been corrected

−FDA warning letter (June 2026, ref 728279) — cited for picturing Eden-branded vials implying Eden compounds the drugs, and for claiming FDA-licensed 503(a) outsourcing facilities

Read the full Eden review →

InsideTracker

+Published pricing, with blood draws at Quest Diagnostics locations nationwide and a mobile-draw option

+Ultimate panel spans roughly 40-50 biomarkers across 10 healthspan categories with a longitudinal dashboard for repeat testing

+More than 15 years of operating history, with HSA/FSA eligibility via Truemed

−No clinician consults or prescriptions; results are informational and must be taken to one's own doctor for treatment

−Mandatory $149/year auto-renewing membership on top of per-test fees; quarterly Ultimate testing runs roughly $1,500/year

−Trustpilot complaints cite unexpected renewal charges and legacy lifetime-access users being pushed into the paid membership

Read the full InsideTracker review →

Eden vs InsideTracker — FAQ

Is Eden better than InsideTracker?

▾

Is Eden or InsideTracker cheaper?

▾

InsideTracker has the lower starting price (from $12/mo vs $124/mo for Eden). Starting prices are for the cheapest treatment each offers — compare the specific treatment you need, and check what each price includes.

What do Eden and InsideTracker both offer?

▾

Both platforms treat Longevity & Peptides. Eden covers 7 treatment categories total and InsideTracker covers 2.

Still deciding?

Eden alternatives InsideTracker alternatives Take the Match Quiz