Home›Compare›Lavender Sky Health vs Peter MD

Lavender Sky Health vs Peter MD: Which Is Better?

Head-to-head comparison of Lavender Sky Health and Peter MD based on our independent scoring across trust, value, experience, product range, and reputation — plus real pricing for the treatments they both offer.

Our Verdict

Lavender Sky Health scores higher overall in our independent evaluation (72.5/100 vs 51.7/100), leading on trust & safety, value, experience, product range, reputation. Peter MD has the lower entry price (from $39/mo vs $55/mo), so the better value depends on which treatment you need.

Lavender Sky Health is a physician-owned, pay-per-consult telehealth practice that lets patients choose among 13 compounding pharmacies, with every plan price published upfront.

Visit Lavender Sky Health
52
Peter MD
Below Average

Peter MD is a low-cost TRT-focused telehealth brand claiming 400K+ subscribers, operating with limited public corporate transparency.

Visit Peter MD

Score Breakdown

DimensionLavender Sky HealthPeter MD
Overall Score72.5/100 ✓51.7/100
Trust & Safety30%70/100 ✓40/100
Value25%85/100 ✓60/100
Experience20%62/100 ✓55/100
Product Range15%76/100 ✓68/100
Reputation10%64/100 ✓35/100

At a Glance

Founded20232019
HeadquartersSouth CarolinaVero Beach, FL
Publicly tradedNoNo
Treatment categories44
Treatments listed107
Starting price$55/mo$39/mo

Pricing Where They Compete

Prices shown are based on our most recent research and may not reflect current pricing. Telehealth providers update their pricing frequently. Always verify pricing directly with the provider before purchasing.

CategoryLavender Sky HealthPeter MD
Weight Loss / GLP-1$55–$85
Naltrexone / Bupropion (compounded)
$199–$399
GLP-1 Weight Loss

Lavender Sky Health

+Every consult fee and pharmacy-specific plan price is published before booking, across 13 named compounding pharmacies the patient chooses between
+Among the lowest effective compounded GLP-1 costs we track: tier plans from about $195–219 for an 8–10 week supply, with price set by total mg rather than a membership
+Pay-per-consult model ($65 new, $40 follow-up every 6 months) with no recurring platform fee
−13% of Trustpilot reviews are one-star, citing inconsistent vial fill levels, heat-damaged shipments and slow refunds
−Support reportedly deflects quality and shipping problems to the chosen pharmacy
−Slower path to medication: e-consult review within 3 business days, then 2–10 business days for pharmacy shipping
Read the full Lavender Sky Health review →

Peter MD

+Tiered commitment pricing (monthly vs. 6- vs. 12-month) offers a materially lower cost for patients willing to commit longer
+Broad hormone-therapy product range including an HCG add-on protocol alongside standard TRT
+Claims a large existing patient base (400K+ subscribers), suggesting operational scale
−No legal entity name, business registration, or physical address disclosed anywhere on the public site
−Trustpilot has removed the company's profile for violating platform guidelines, eliminating independent third-party review verification
−The site displays a self-reported '4.9/5 from 20K+ reviews' claim that cannot be checked against any independent platform
Read the full Peter MD review →

Lavender Sky Health vs Peter MD — FAQ

Is Lavender Sky Health better than Peter MD?

▾

Lavender Sky Health scores higher overall in our independent evaluation (72.5/100 vs 51.7/100), leading on trust & safety, value, experience, product range, reputation. Peter MD has the lower entry price (from $39/mo vs $55/mo), so the better value depends on which treatment you need.

Is Lavender Sky Health or Peter MD cheaper?

▾

Peter MD has the lower starting price (from $39/mo vs $55/mo for Lavender Sky Health). Starting prices are for the cheapest treatment each offers — compare the specific treatment you need, and check what each price includes.

What do Lavender Sky Health and Peter MD both offer?

▾

Both platforms treat Weight Loss / GLP-1. Lavender Sky Health covers 4 treatment categories total and Peter MD covers 4.

Still deciding?