Home›Compare›Elektra Health vs Natural Cycles

Elektra Health vs Natural Cycles: Which Is Better?

Head-to-head comparison of Elektra Health and Natural Cycles based on our independent scoring across trust, value, experience, product range, and reputation — plus real pricing for the treatments they both offer.

Our Verdict

Natural Cycles scores higher overall in our independent evaluation (67.4/100 vs 62.7/100), leading on value, experience. Elektra Health comes out ahead on trust & safety, product range, reputation.

63

New York-based menopause clinic combining telemedicine with a board-certified clinician and a 1:1 coach, insurance-first (including NY Medicaid) with $249/$149 cash visits, in 16 states.

Visit Elektra Health
67

FDA-cleared, hormone-free digital contraceptive that uses temperature data from a thermometer or wearable to flag fertile days; it involves no clinician or prescription.

Visit Natural Cycles

Score Breakdown

DimensionElektra HealthNatural Cycles
Overall Score62.7/10067.4/100 ✓
Trust & Safety30%76/100 ✓70/100
Value25%55/10076/100 ✓
Experience20%60/10072/100 ✓
Product Range15%50/100 ✓45/100
Reputation10%66/100 ✓62/100

At a Glance

Founded20192013
HeadquartersNew York, NYStockholm, Sweden
Publicly tradedNoNo
Treatment categories21
Treatments listed31
Starting price$149/mo$12.5/mo

Pricing Where They Compete

Prices shown are based on our most recent research and may not reflect current pricing. Telehealth providers update their pricing frequently. Always verify pricing directly with the provider before purchasing.

CategoryElektra HealthNatural Cycles
Women's Health$149
Follow-up Visit (cash)
$12.5
NC° Birth Control (annual plan incl. NC° Band)

Elektra Health

+Prescribes only FDA-approved therapies, with named, credentialed clinicians (most Menopause Society-certified)
+Each patient is paired with both a clinician and a 1:1 coach, plus an education library and community events
+Accepts commercial insurance and several New York Medicaid plans; partnered with Oscar Health on a menopause-focused ACA plan
−Clinical care is limited to 16 states
−Cash visits are expensive ($249 initial, $149 per 15-minute follow-up), and medications are billed separately at the patient's pharmacy
−$50 fee for cancellations inside 24 hours; a reviewer reports being billed for a consult advertised as free
Read the full Elektra Health review →

Natural Cycles

+Only FDA-cleared digital contraceptive (Class II De Novo, 2018), with no hormones or side effects
+Low all-in cost: about $150/year including the NC° Band wearable, HSA/FSA-eligible
+Works with existing wearables (Oura, Apple Watch Series 8+, Garmin) and switches between contraception, conception, pregnancy, postpartum and perimenopause modes at no extra charge
−Typical-use effectiveness is 93%, below IUDs and implants, and depends on daily measurement and abstaining or using protection on fertile days
−No clinician involvement or prescription options; not a substitute for a birth-control prescriber
−December 2025 class action alleges reproductive-health data was shared with third-party trackers without consent
Read the full Natural Cycles review →

Elektra Health vs Natural Cycles — FAQ

Is Elektra Health better than Natural Cycles?

▾

Natural Cycles scores higher overall in our independent evaluation (67.4/100 vs 62.7/100), leading on value, experience. Elektra Health comes out ahead on trust & safety, product range, reputation.

Is Elektra Health or Natural Cycles cheaper?

▾

Natural Cycles has the lower starting price (from $12.5/mo vs $149/mo for Elektra Health). Starting prices are for the cheapest treatment each offers — compare the specific treatment you need, and check what each price includes.

What do Elektra Health and Natural Cycles both offer?

▾

Both platforms treat Women's Health. Elektra Health covers 2 treatment categories total and Natural Cycles covers 1.

Still deciding?

Elektra Health alternativesNatural Cycles alternativesTake the Match Quiz